recently discovered the web euprofiler.eu which I found quite interesting.
The site asks you a series of questions (30 specifically), then you question the importance we give to these questions, the likelihood they would vote for certain parties, and gives you what place in the political and party lines you anymore.
I have gone to a European level, fit perfectly with the Swedish Pirate Party and the English level which is closer to the PSOE, followed closely by IU. Let's say I found only half accurate, because in fact I would recommend for a European vote before the PSOE IU. This is independent of the current situation, I would simply because of global vision of society, by the weight of ecology in the program of the United Left, and because European power now is much more legislative executive. I also found it funny how high out ERC, the party they never vote and I have always seemed a CANTAMAÑANAS. I guess it's because there is an axis for "In what latitude is the English border"-P.
I was also surprised how high UPyD out, especially after seeing your ad for Europe:
I made a series of questions, as if carried in your program UPyD eliminate the use of 23 official languages \u200b\u200bcurrently spoken in the European Parliament with 506 combinations, or whether it is the already Rosa's famous Ten demagoguery that had absolutely no idea to propose to the European and decided to appeal to the instincts UPyD typical voter. The only problem is that the argument always UPyD languages \u200b\u200bis very bad at the European level, where all the languages \u200b\u200bof the countries are respected and no one proposes to restrict the use of each of the same regardless of its population. I also it is doubtful whether the fact that the match is against Italy means that for Rosa Diez Berlusconi's Italy is the example to follow. Would not only enlighten us.
By the way, whatever you do, I recommend you to vote for someone who pass the test CEF.
0 comments:
Post a Comment